Women vs. Men |
Written by Natalia Pogonina | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tuesday, 02 March 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
by Natalia Pogonina for her Chess.com Tuesday column There is nothing that disgusts a man like getting beaten at chess by a woman. Charles Dudley Warner Playing in mixed events is enjoyable since it allows one to learn more about chess and psychology, and to improve more rapidly. So why, one might ask, are women often segregated? The problem is that most organizers dont support female players by introducing special prizes for women. Therefore, each time you play in a mixed event, you have to be ready to bear expenses and earn nothing, which is not what a chess pro is looking for. As a result, most strong female players prefer to participate in tournaments that can offer them a chance to gain a title and win a prize. The obvious drawback of this is that its harder for them to progress just imagine that you are regularly beating 2000-2400 FIDE players and learning hardly anything instead of clashing with the titans! Thats also one of the reasons why there are so few GMs among women. You just cant obtain the norms no matter how well you perform, unless there is a certain percentage of GMs among your opponents. And where would you get those in a female tournament? Our game is an example of exciting attacking chess; I hope you will like it:
Write Comment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 02 March 2010 ) |
< Prev | Next > |
---|