News
About Natalia
Games
Our Team
Articles
Gallery
Chess Links
Play Chess
Pogonina's Chess Shop
Advertise
Contact Us

Highlights

 Follow Natalia on Twitter:

http://www.pogonina.com/images//nat%20twit.jpg

 
Please help Natalia promote chess by making a donation:



 

Link to Pogonina.com

Play chess at ChessOk

365Chess.com Biggest Online Chess Games Database





Check qyto.jp for Japanese bitcoin casinos.

Here you can find Swedish sites without license, Spelkonto utan licens.

Find new casinos at the brand new Online Casinos XYZ site with reviews and ratings of the best gambling sites for UK players.

Play the popular King Kong Cash slot machine at Slot Strike, the new slot site for UK players.

Grab the chance to win big with a high RTP on the goonies slot progressive jackpot.

Goodluckmate.com - made an easier way to find Skrill casinos

Nettikasinot.media lists the best online casinos for Finnish gamblers. For more information visit: https://www.nettikasinot.media/suomalaiset-kasinot/  

Sweden is now a regulated market, which means that as a player you can only play at casinos with a license. See all regulated
casinos in Sweden by Mr casinova.

To find the best casino in Norway take look at
norske casino at CasinoPiloten.

Find the best Norwegian casinobonus at NyeCasinoNorge.org.

Get exclusive access to a
huge range of free spins & no deposit casino offers with Spin Bonus.

Try the exhilarating new 20p Roulette game.
Play it online at thecasinodb and find casinos to play for real money.

Get the best casino bonus information with Casino Gorilla.

Chess games at Gametop

CasinoAdvisers.com For you that want to find online casino strategies, guides and a good casino bonus!

 
   More...


Polls
What's your FIDE rating?

What should Natalia do to make Pogonina.com more interesting for you?

Who is your favorite active top player?

Poker or chess: what do you like more?

What's the largest monetary chess prize you ever won?

How much time per day do you spend on chess-related activities?

Do you have a special chess mascot (pen, badge, toy, etc.)?

Which time control do you prefer for over-the-board tournaments?

The strongest women's chess team in the world is

What is the strongest national chess team in the world?

Will Magnus Carlsen's rating reach FIDE 2900?

Do you think you can become a GM?

Love for Chess or Sex with the Pieces?

User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Written by Administrator   
Thursday, 22 September 2011
Image
IM Vladislav Akselrod
Exclusively for Pogonina.com


On a separate note.
 

Let me disappoint the horny readers by the following disclaimer: this article is about chess. A person with a perverted fantasy may literally experience such a pleasure, but with THAT level of imagination one doesn't need to read articles at all.
 

Back to the point.
 

A little bit about myself. Peter Zhdanov relates to my activity as "specific attitude towards chess". Others use different terms, but I prefer Peter's wording.
 

For example, I like finding generalizations of notions that seem to be unconnected to each other: cola and meat (both are edible), school and street (both can teach you something), chess and life (can't be explained within the boundaries of a single article).
 

I particularly like this process
 

Similarly, I love finding the difference between seemingly identical notions.
 

A sniper and a person carrying a rifle, move pieces and play chess
 

It's important to keep in mind that logical constructions should have real life applications.
 

Let's consider two notions: Love and Sex.
 

All adults believe they know what Love and Sex is. Some consider them to be synonymous, while others (including me) think that there is a great difference between the meaning of these two words.
 

IMHO the key difference between Love and Sex is that in the one case a constant result is vital, while in the other it is about the quality of the result. As for me, the difference is great. And what about you?
 

Now let's switch to chess.
 

Let me start off with a simple example.
 

Once in a local park my opponent was trying to flag me one game after another (the odds was 5 minutes to 1 in his favor). Then he became unsatisfied with the results and demanded a 5 min vs 30 seconds handicap! I have simply removed the board altogether and set up the requested time control on the clock. Why use a chess board at all in this case? The one who wins on flag wins the game. I was especially delighted by observing the faces of passer-byes who were confusedly staring at two idiots, both of whom were passionately hitting the clock. Frankly speaking, the show didn't last long: a friend of mine came along, and I resigned. While I believe my behavior was right, I am still somewhat sad as I believe I could have still beaten the dude even in this "game".
 

Please keep your associations and suggestions on how this game could be named to yourself. I will act likewise.


Now a more complicated example:
 

You won two games. The first one - after a terrible blunder by your opponent in a position where you were lost; #2 - after a complicated positional struggle you won with a brilliant mating combination. Would you consider these two wins to be equal?
 

Or here is another situation (#3): your plan was deep, decisions - excellent. You got a winning position and...blundered a mate in 1 in time trouble. How would you evaluate this case?
 

Which game would you like most - 1, 2 or 3?
 

My personal favorite is 4 a game which I lost, although I played one of the best games (in terms of quality) in my life.
 

Btw, recently I expressed my gratitude for a worthy lesson at the board to my opponent after the game, and he was genuinely surprised! Now it was my turn to become surprised.
 

To sum it all up, I would like to say that, if I am not confusing things, the argument between quality and essence has been going on since the ancient Greece, when one fraction of mathematicians was claiming that two different identities (e.g. an elephant and a fly) can't be expressed by the same number - 1.


Now you know which party prevailed.
 

On the other hand, sages from the East used to say that lack of action is also an activity. 
 

Any by far not the most passive.
 

So can 0 sometimes be more than 1?
 

Or is "a dead lion worse than a living dog"?



You can book a chess lesson with International Master Vladislav Akselrod (FIDE 2431) at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it


Related reading:
Winning against Nakamura

Bookmark and Share



Comments (4)
1. Written by Peter on 17:40 22 2011 .
 
 
, . 
 
. , . 
 
, ( ), , - , .., - . , , . .. , (, ) , - .
 
2. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 18:27 22 2011 .
 
 
:)
 
3. Written by on 09:59 23 2011 .
 
 
?
- . . - . . . - . - . - .C - . 
- . - " " - . - . - . - . C . .
 
4. Written by on 20:35 23 2011 .
 
 
?
, , . - , , , . , , .
 

Write Comment
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Thursday, 22 September 2011 )
 
< Prev   Next >