News
About Natalia
Games
Our Team
Articles
Gallery
Chess Links
Play Chess
Pogonina's Chess Shop
Advertise
Contact Us

Highlights

 Follow Natalia on Twitter:

http://www.pogonina.com/images//nat%20twit.jpg

 




Please help Natalia promote chess by making a donation:

 

Women's
chess live ratings

Link to Pogonina.com


Chess Evolution

Top GM secrets revealed

Play chess at ChessOk

365Chess.com Biggest Online Chess Games Database




 
 
   ...


Polls
What's your FIDE rating?

What should Natalia do to make Pogonina.com more interesting for you?

Who is your favorite active top player?

Poker or chess: what do you like more?

What's the largest monetary chess prize you ever won?

How much time per day do you spend on chess-related activities?

Do you have a special chess mascot (pen, badge, toy, etc.)?

Which time control do you prefer for over-the-board tournaments?

The strongest women's chess team in the world is

What is the strongest national chess team in the world?

Will Magnus Carlsen's rating reach FIDE 2900?

Whom would you prefer to be the next FIDE President?

Who will win the World Chess Championship Match-2014?

Deep Thought

User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Written by Administrator   
Tuesday, 06 March 2012


by Natalia Pogonina for her
Chess.com Tuesday column

Any strong chess player must know when to take a deep think, and when to make a move quickly. Time management is critical: you cant be too fast, you cant be too slow.

Here are the three typical situations when you might want to take your time:

1.      Choosing a plan.

2.      When you can significantly improve your position, e.g., gain advantage or equality.

3.      Critical moments when the result of the game is at stake.


Choosing a plan is typical of the opening-middlegame transition and for the later stages of the game. Mindless shuffling of pieces wont lead to any good. You should have clear goals in mind and know what to aim for in the current position. Evaluating the position, choosing where to place pieces, preventing your opponents counter-play all this requires time. If you are playing without a plan, you had better stop and reconsider what you are doing.
 

However, even if you have a good plan, things are still not easy. How does one notice opportunities for improving the position? The better your intuition is and the more experience you have, the easier it is to feel such moments. But there are also some signs that should serve as an alarm to you:
 

1.      A promising sacrifice is available, but you cant evaluate the consequences.

2.      You see that the opponent has probably made a wrong move, one that doesnt follow his correct plan.

3.      Your pieces are optimally placed, and you feel theres got to be a way of capitalizing on their potential.

4.      Your opponents pieces are misplaced.


The strength of a player is largely dependent on whether he can feel when a critical moment occurs, and act accordingly. Here are a few signs of that:
 

1.      Many candidate moves lose on the spot, or lead to a bad position. Maybe there is only one playable move available, and you should find it.

2.      Tactical fight. E.g., when both sides are attacking each other's kings, at some point a critical moment will happen.

3.      Transitions, e.g. when one side can simplify into a winning endgame.


During critical moments there is usually only one really good move, while others are significantly inferior.
 

In the game against Kaplan from the Womens World Team Chess Championship11 there were a few points when I had to take a deep think:
 

1.      On move 9 I had to choose between the calm continuation Rb8 and a pawn sacrifice Nd5. In the latter case I also had to decide where to retreat with the knight. This belongs to the first category choosing a plan.

2.      On move 16 I had to determine the future course of events: leave the knight on a3, or allow it to enter the game.

3.      The first critical moment in the game happened on move 22. Instead of Ng5 with a strong attack I decided to win an exchange. The signs were: misplaced White pieces (queen, rook on f3 and king) and a significant change in the course of the game after winning the exchange.

4.      On move 25 I had to choose a new plan, and didnt quite succeed.

5.      On move 29 I had to make the right move to equalize. The main idea was to stop the White pawns, so it wasnt hard to find the move. However, I somehow overlooked it, and my position became rather gloomy. Things went downhill after I played h6 instead of creating counter-play with h5.  

6.      Move 35 was the second critical moment of the game. I had to settle for a draw, but instead started pressing for a win at all costs.

7.      The third critical moment move 39. Only one continuation led to a win, while other moves gave White at least equality. The prerequisites of the sacrifice were a strong bishop on a7 and the fact that if Black lingers, White can start pushing the pawns on the queenside.  

 



Bookmark and Share




Comments (1)
1. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 20:22 07 2012 .
 
 
Chess Game Kaplan, E. (1849) vs. Pogonin
Nice game and I enjoyed reading your comments.
 

Write Comment
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 06 March 2012 )
 
< Prev   Next >