News
About Natalia
Games
Our Team
Articles
Gallery
Chess Links
Play Chess
Pogonina's Chess Shop
Advertise
Contact Us

Highlights

 Follow Natalia on Twitter:

http://www.pogonina.com/images//nat%20twit.jpg

 



Please help Natalia promote chess by making a donation:

 


 

Women's
chess live ratings

Link to Pogonina.com





Play chess at ChessOk

365Chess.com Biggest Online Chess Games Database


 
 
   ...


Polls
What's your FIDE rating?

What should Natalia do to make Pogonina.com more interesting for you?

Who is your favorite active top player?

Poker or chess: what do you like more?

What's the largest monetary chess prize you ever won?

How much time per day do you spend on chess-related activities?

Do you have a special chess mascot (pen, badge, toy, etc.)?

Which time control do you prefer for over-the-board tournaments?

The strongest women's chess team in the world is

What is the strongest national chess team in the world?

Will Magnus Carlsen's rating reach FIDE 2900?

Do you think you can become a GM?

How to Analyze Chess Games

User Rating: / 12
PoorBest 
Written by Administrator   
Tuesday, 03 August 2010


by Natalia Pogonina for her
Chess.com Tuesday column


One of the most efficient ways of improving in chess is analyzing ones own games. The legendary world chess champion Botvinnik emphasized the importance of this activity and urged masters to publish analyses of their games in the media. I believe that most readers will agree with me that studying ones mistakes is more important than dwelling on other peoples failures. There is just one tiny problem: most chess players have no idea how to do it.


Ok, another round has ended. You are tired and worried about the next game, so why bother making things worse by reviewing todays loss? Oh, sorry, did you actually win? A won game is won, why bother looking at it? Sounds funny, but many chess players really act this way.


A second widespread option is far from perfect too:  after the end of the tournament the player turns on his PC, quickly pinpoints the blunders and substitutes them with the right moves (using space bar) and hastily edits the opening tree (the dubious moves are replaced by the most popular book lines). A quarter of an hour, and youre done! This approach hardly achieves anything though.


If the description above more or less fits you, you might ask: and what is the correct way to analyze games? Lets talk about it in detail:
1.    Right after the game is over you should write down the thoughts you had in mind during the encounter. This will help you understand the nature of your mistakes later on. For example, put down: I wanted to get the knight to f5, but was afraid of the move g5 by Black. Or I believed this exchange leads to a favorable pawn structure, so I wanted to trade all the pieces and win the endgame.  At this stage there is no need for using chess engines. Of course, you may be forced to fix your openings if someone finds a hole there. Let your coach/second (if available) do it, or review the variation yourself, but dont feed the whole game to your computer assistant.
2.    Once you have spare time (after the tournament), you should recall what happened over the board. Your notes will prove helpful at this point. Now you will have a chance to reconsider your decisions and try to understand where you went wrong. Try to scan the game move by move and find tactical refutations, positional errors, right plans, etc. Annotate the game again using a different color, e.g. I wanted to get the knight to f5, but was afraid of the move g5 by Black. "I guess I should have done that anyway since g5 runs into h4 with good attacking chances for White".
3.    After youre done, you may finally bring your chess engine to the rescue. Take a look at the mistakes you have made otb and during your home analysis. Pay special attention to the positions where you couldnt find the right solution after two attempts. For instance, if you blundered terribly otb, chances are you will be able to find the correct move at home. However, if the nature of your mistake was deeper, e.g. not understanding a certain middlegame position or not knowing how to handle an endgame, chances are you will face problems untangling it even during post-mortem.  In this case your PC or coach may prove extremely helpful.
4.    After you have reviewed the game and annotations using a chess engine, pay special attention to the key moments of the game. Memorize the associated principles, e.g. in such rook endgames the pawns should be placed like this. Or in this opening the light-squared bishop shouldnt be exchanged since keeping it is essential for protecting the light squares on the queenside. Or in such structures an isolated pawn may prove to be a force, not a weakness. The same refers to your opening tree make the appropriate changes.

Last time we have seen a game from the Mulhouse 2010-GM tournament that I should have won, but lost. Now the case is different: I was totally lost, but managed to hang on and eventually grab the full point. Here is how it proceeded:




Having faced serious problems in the opening, I had to analyze the game carefully to make sure it doesnt happen again. Also, thanks to the analysis, I have refreshed my knowledge of rook endings and Q vs R. This is very beneficial for an improving chess player.


P.S. A classic reminder: I understand perfectly well that for many people chess is just a game played for fun, so I am not claiming that everyone should follow the steps described above. However, for people who take chess seriously and/or set ambitious goals, this process is almost a must-do. Wink

Bookmark and Share





Comments (8)
1. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 15:39 03 2010 .
 
 
Excelent!
Brief, concise and didactic. 
 
Thanks a lot for sharing it.
 
2. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 16:01 03 2010 .
 
 
Excelent!
I love to play chess, and watch chess games but writing every thing down i'm not used to writing down every thing is that good or bad? thank-you for the good information , it help .
 
3. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 17:01 03 2010 .
 
 
Excelent!
You are awesome. Thanks!
 
4. Written by jestem_ciekaw on 17:42 03 2010 .
 
 
Excelent!
great article! BTW how do you know if your whole plan was incorrect? I tend to play the position out against engine with opp. colour to see what plan it chooses.
 
5. Written by on 18:22 03 2010 .
 
 
! - . ! . . ! . . . . . , . . C .
 
6. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 19:48 03 2010 .
 
 
Never thought of asking myself what was I thinking during certain moves. Great idea! :)
 
7. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 19:29 04 2010 .
 
 
Hi I'm 1504 Fide rated. I didn't understand everything in the game against Anthony Wirig but I found it very didactic. I'll try to improve with it. Thanks.
 
8. Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 04:13 06 2010 .
 
 
Thanks
Well done, Natalia. Many thanks for your clearly and didactic lesson. We want more than this...
 

Write Comment
Name:
E-mail
Homepage
Title:
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 03 August 2010 )
 
< Prev   Next >